315.443.2308
100 Sims Hall, Building V
Syracuse NY 13244-1230
Students and faculty in the discipline of communication and rhetorical studies (CRS) focus on communicative discourse and its interactional consequences.
Our collective goals are to articulate the variety and complexity of communication phenomena and the co-creation of social realities that grow out of this process. As researchers of this process, we use social scientific and humanistic methods in order to describe, explain, or critique communication practices.
The roots of our discipline extend back to the classical study of rhetoric, most notably Aristotle. Two of the earliest known rhetoricians, Corax and Tisias, residents of the ancient city of Syracuse, were the first to theorize on the practice of persuasion. While the study of rhetoric and oratory continue to be a central feature of the discipline, researchers have extended the purview to examine other forms of communication, such as interpersonal, group, and organizational communication; argumentation; and political and mediated discourse.
The study and practice of communication is a prominent feature of the educational mission at Syracuse University. In conjunction with this mission, the mission of the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies is to engage with colleagues, graduate, and undergraduate students in innovative, inclusive, and collaborative inquiry into the various theories, perspectives, and methods constituting human communication, rhetorical, and cosmopolitan processes.
The department’s mission blends a traditional liberal arts education with discipline-based knowledge, critical thinking, and the development of communication and rhetorical skills. The approach of communication and rhetorical studies seeks to inform the practice, understanding, and critique of communication primarily with the spoken word, but also with nonverbal, written, or electronic formats.
The department’s curriculum integrates theory and practice. Students assess communication theories, perform theoretically-grounded critiques of communication practices and situations, evaluate and employ research methods, engage in supervised performance-driven experiences, and assess issues of ethics and social justice thereof.
The vision of the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies is to create with colleagues and students discourse communities competent in communication, rhetoric, and cosmopolitanism.
The vision is supported by the core values of our discipline, which complement the values declared in the Syracuse University vision statement. Our core values, as articulated by the National Communication Association, are:
Embodied in our vision is a desire to help students and colleagues understand that communication not only matters significantly in human affairs, but that its significance is often underappreciated. Because of the ubiquitous nature of conversation, people rarely understand the complexity and scope of communication phenomena. While the general public readily acknowledges the influence of media messages or the value of communication skills in presenting oneself as competent, few recognize how much our assumptions about the social and physical world are shaped by metaphors, language choices, and particular discourse practices. Our vision is that as students and colleagues embrace this simple but profound insight, new worlds of possibility become apparent. Instead of simply representing social realities, communication becomes understood as the primary means of creating, sustaining, or altering those realities.
Mission and vision are empty statements if they are not realized in everyday practice. The implementation of our mission and vision is seen in the objectives that we seek to obtain when we enter the classroom, advise our students, and engage in our own scholarly efforts.
The curriculum, programs, and learning activities provide students with critical, theoretical, methodological, and practical abilities. These abilities:
As students move through the curriculum, they:
As faculty members, we: