Content Comparison

A

Performance of superior quality, intellectually, formally and technically. There is clear evidence of genuine talent and architectural insight. Reserved for work that is extremely sound and not merely flashy.

B

Performance of good quality that has aesthetic merit and technical competence, although some problems are noted. Work reflects a solid commitment to the learning process and an understanding of the issues.

C

Performance of acceptable quality that meets the basic goals of the exercise, is presented in a complete manner and does not contain serious errors of judgment or omission.

D

Performance of inferior quality that may reflect a conscientious effort on the part of the student, but contains many serious errors of judgment, lacks aesthetic skill and/or is incomplete in presentation. The work does not meet the instructional goals in several areas.

F

Performance that is seriously deficient in merit and effort. Given to those projects that reflect a lack of class attendance, significant incompleteness and/or lack of interest in the subject material. Student should be counseled about commitment to studies and the possibility of transferring out of architecture.